Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Feb 2012
The legislative framework under which Australia’s new ‘R&D Tax Incentive’ (R&DTI) is to be administered received Royal Assent on 8 September 2011. The underlying policy objective of the R&DTI is to make Australian companies more innovative and globally competitive. One key feature of the R&DTI is the adoption of a tax credit system for research and development (R&D) expenditure, similar to that already in operation in the UK.
This article identifies lessons for Australia (principally for policymakers, but also for practitioners and tax administrators) based on the UK experience of R&D tax credits. Findings are informed by in-depth interviews conducted with UK-based R&D tax advisors as to their evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the UK system in terms of its design, implementation and outcomes. The lessons include the need for policymakers to remain focused on the objectives of the R&DTI and how best to achieve these. This requires careful consideration of the level of incentives provided and the recipients. Simplicity should be a key objective. Tax administrators have an important role to play in promoting the scheme, and in particular, by engaging practitioners.
More by Ann Hansford
Book review: Fiscal reform in Spain: Accomplishments and challenges - Journal 01 Apr 2008
An international comparative analysis of self assessment: What lessons are there for tax administrators? - Journal 01 Oct 2005
Developing the UK Self Assessment Regime: Is Collaboration the Key? - Journal 01 Jan 2004
The Compliance Burden of VAT: Further Evidence from the UK - Journal 01 Oct 2002
More by Margaret Mckerchar
Tax aware investment management by public offer superannuation funds in Australia: Attitudes, practices and expectations - Journal 01 May 2014
The impact of managing tax risk on the tax compliance behaviour of large Australian companies - Journal 01 Dec 2013
Historical perspectives on the emergence of the tax profession: Australia and the UK - Journal 01 Jul 2013
Understanding Australian small businesses and the drivers of compliance costs: a grounded theory approach - Journal 01 Jul 2009
Fostering green innovation: can Australia's research and development tax concession be more effective? - Journal 01 Feb 2009
Improving the quality of services offered by tax agents: can regulation assist? - Journal 01 Dec 2008
Is there a perception of revenue bias on the part of the ATO in private binding rulings on large, complex issues? - Journal 01 Sep 2008
Is the simplified tax system simple? - Journal 01 Feb 2007
An international comparative analysis of self assessment: What lessons are there for tax administrators? - Journal 01 Oct 2005
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags