Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Jul 2017
The goods and services tax (GST) or value-added tax (VAT) is the most rapidly spreading tax in the world. It accounts for a high proportion of tax revenue in both developing and developed countries. Despite its importance, there is a paucity of studies concerning GST/VAT avoidance. This article attempts to contribute to this relatively small body of literature by comparing and evaluating GST/VAT general anti-avoidance approaches in Australia and South Africa. Both countries have a similar common law heritage and adopted a similar GST/VAT model, although the tax commenced at different times in each country and the two taxes have slightly different bases. An examination of the Australian and South African GST/VAT anti-avoidance approaches reveals some interesting findings. The analysis undertaken by the authors suggests that, although there are differences in style in the drafting of the anti-avoidance rules, the effect of each appears to be similar in both countries.
There would appear to be two differences. First, the Australian Commissioner of Taxation has a discretion, if the Commissioner thinks it fair and reasonable, to make a compensating adjustment to the other party to the transaction if that party is disadvantaged by the Commissioner's determination. Second, the do nothing defence which has been negated in Australia may possibly still be available in South Africa.
More by Kalmen Datt
Taxpayer rights in Australia? Hope springs eternal - Journal 01 Oct 2019
Tax system integrity and directors' obligations under the Corporations Act - A tale of two systems - Journal 01 Jul 2019
The Commissioner's obligation to make compensating adjustments for income tax and GST in Australia and New Zealand - Journal 01 Sep 2018
A critical evaluation of how aspects of the tax system in Australia are administered and their impact on corporations and directors - Journal 01 Jul 2017
The role of the criminal law for serious non compliance - Journal 01 Jul 2013
Ranking of Tax Journals - The Way Forward - Journal 01 Oct 2009
Is there a perception of revenue bias on the part of the ATO in private binding rulings on large, complex issues? - Journal 01 Sep 2008
More by Binh Tran-Nam
Potential tax ratio, tax effort and tax inefficiency in the OECD: an empirical study using the stochastic tax frontier model - Journal 01 Jul 2022
Estimating aggregate tax compliance costs: a bivariate state space approach - Journal 01 Jul 2021
Determinants of level of taxation: An empirical study of OECD countries from 2006 to 2016 - Journal 01 Mar 2020
Estimating aggregate tax compliance costs: a new approach using a state space model - Journal 01 Apr 2017
The impact of recent tax changes on tax complexity and compliance costs: The tax practitioners' perspective - Journal 01 Oct 2016
Tangled up in tape: The continuing tax compliance plight of the small and medium enterprise business sector - Journal 01 May 2014
Personal taxpayer compliance costs: Recent evidence from Australia - Journal 01 Apr 2014
How close are taxable income and accounting profit? An empirical study of large Australian companies - Journal 01 Sep 2013
A comparative analysis of tax advisers' perception of small business tax law complexity: United States, Australia and New Zealand - Journal 01 Dec 2012
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags