Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Sep 2018
The sugar tax debate is showing no sign of weakening. There are two opposing views, which are perhaps best represented by the ideologies of the health profession and the food and beverage industry. The former strongly advocates in favour of a sugar tax using population health to support their position. The latter uses individual choice and paternalism to argue against implementation of sugar taxes.
This study examines a related component of the sugar tax problem, which is how we evaluate such a tax. An alternative theoretical framework, the New Zealand Treasury Living Standards Framework, which has a corrective rather than a revenue generation objective, is used to assess the sugar tax for consideration of a different, perhaps more relevant, criteria for tax.
The study concludes that there is value in using alternative frameworks when evaluating non-traditional taxes. A framework that facilitates inclusion of a wide range of wellbeing measures is particularly relevant for a tax that has multiple objectives. However, the traditional tax policy criteria remain a valuable component of the tax policy evaluation toolkit.
More by Lisa Marriott
Indigenous perspectives on and in tax research policy - Journal 01 Oct 2022
Tax as a solution for irrigation water scarcity, quality and sustainability: case studies in Australia and New Zealand - Journal 01 Oct 2021
Water taxes: a systematic literature review with application to Australia and New Zealand - Journal 01 Dec 2020
Income equalisation: Is all fair in primary production and tax law? - Journal 01 Jul 2019
Book review - Comparative taxation: Why tax systems differ - Journal 01 Dec 2018
Taxing corruption in Australia and New Zealand - Journal 01 Apr 2016
Retirement savings and gender: An Australasian comparison - Journal 01 Dec 2013
New Zealand retirement saving and taxation: Lessons from Australia - Journal 01 Apr 2010
Taxation of retirement savings: New Zealand - the extreme social experiment - Journal 01 Jan 2007
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags