Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Mar 2020
The nature of goodwill for tax purposes was an important issue in Australia long before the adoption of the Commonwealth income tax, with the relationship between goodwill and sales of business premises a central issue in colonial stamp duty assessments (and consequent litigation). Judicial precedents and doctrines were transferred into the income tax arena as a result of a provision in the first Commonwealth income tax law that allowed depreciation of goodwill associated with leasehold interests. Judicial views were subsequently refined when the nature of goodwill was considered in the context of small business concessions for gains on the disposal of goodwill and in an important case in which a vendor created a notional goodwill asset in the course of a financial arrangement. Importantly, since 1964, Australian taxpayers have not been able to depreciate the cost of any form of purchased wasting goodwill. The Australian tax position stands in contrast with that of the UK, Canada, the US and many other countries. This article reviews the concept of goodwill in Australian tax law and suggests allowance of depreciation of purchased goodwill would be a logical reform to make, contributing to better alignment of the law with benchmark income tax principles.
More by Richard Krever
Identifying tax aggressive behaviour: testing the proxies - Journal 01 Apr 2022
The effectiveness of voluntary corporate tax disclosures: an Australian case study - Journal 01 Dec 2021
Bespoke tax rulings and profit shifting in the European Union: assessing the EU's options - Journal 01 Oct 2021
Tax expenditure scholarship and analysis in China - Journal 01 Apr 2019
The adoption of GST in Malaysia: Lessons not learned and a few new paths - Journal 01 Jul 2017
Is integration of income taxation possible in the EU? - Journal 01 Aug 2015
The influence of alternative model tax treaties on Australian treaties - Journal 01 Mar 2011
Taxing capital income - Journal 01 Apr 2007
Characterising Derivative-based Loan Arrangements - Journal 01 Oct 2004
More by Christina Allen
The confused path of the Australian corporate tax residence rules: is reform necessary? - Journal 22 Apr 2024
Lost and found coins: cryptocurrency chain splits in Australia - Journal 15 Dec 2023
Statutory depreciation regimes for intangible assets - Journal 01 Jul 2021
From uncertainty to objectivity: Reforming tax deductions for repair costs in Australia - Journal 01 Dec 2020
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags