Source: The Tax Specialist Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Jun 2011
Increasingly, Australian regulators are invoking the criminal process, contemporaneously with more traditional civil recovery methods, in order to regulate tax evasion. Project Wickenby is a prime example of the increasing tendency of regulators to proceed by way of criminal prosecution. In this article, which is published in two parts, the author considers issues arising out of modern concurrent tax fraud regulation.
Part 1, which was published in the previous issue of this journal, identified and analysed modern indictable offences which may be alleged in a classic tax fraud context. Part 2, by reference to the criminal exposure identified in Part 1, identifies and analyses the potential interference that concurrent tax fraud regulation may have on the criminal process in a defended matter. Part 2 also addresses possible ways in which any prejudice flowing from this interference may be mitigated.
More by Mathew Leighton-Daly
Asset protection and tax avoidance - Journal 17 Jun 2024
Wickenby-related tax crime prosecutions - Journal 01 Feb 2018
Are you facing an unlimited amendment period due to fraud or evasion? - Journal 01 Oct 2015
Are you facing an unlimited amendment period due to fraud or evasion - Where does the law stand? - Paper 21 May 2015
Are you facing an unlimited amendment period due to fraud or evasion - Where does the law stand? - Presentation 21 May 2015
Taxation, civil forfeiture and unexplained wealth: Part 2 - Journal 01 Apr 2013
Taxation, civil forfeiture and unexplained wealth: Part 1 - Journal 01 Mar 2013
Contemporary tax fraud regulation: Part 1 - Criminal exposure - Journal 01 Apr 2011
Challenging the Commissioner's non-curial powers " an alternative to judicial review - Journal 01 Jul 2010
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags