Source: The Tax Specialist Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Aug 2012
The allocation of value between land and non-land assets has direct duty and capital gains tax (CGT) implications. What is required for duty purposes is the apportionment of the market value of the whole going concern entity between land and non-land assets to assess whether the relevant duty threshold has been exceeded.
For CGT purposes, the value apportionment between land and non-land assets is required for a principal asset test to assess Australian CGT payable by foreign residents. In this article, the authors discuss relevant valuation principles, and conclude that a value apportionment exercise conducted for duty and CGT purposes warrants more complex and lateral valuation thinking than does the normal total value assessment exercise undertaken for the purposes of the underlying commercial transaction. Unfortunately, the necessary shift in valuation thinking when the focus of valuation changes from total value assessment to value apportionment has received little attention in practice, and there are likely to be negative flow-on duty and CGT implications.
More by Hung Chu
Assessing market value ratios for roll-over relief provision - Journal 01 Nov 2019
The Placer case (2018) from a valuation perspective - Journal 01 Jul 2019
Valuation of contract intangibles for tax and duty purposes - Journal 01 Oct 2016
Value allocation: Upstream and downstream segments - Journal 01 Aug 2016
Pitfalls in applying the small company risk premium for tax and duty purposes - Journal 01 Apr 2016
Why the restoration method is flawed - Journal 01 Feb 2016
Common errors in applying the market value concept - Journal 01 Jul 2015
Pitfalls in the valuation of specialised in situ fixed assets for tax and duty purposes - Journal 01 Jun 2015
A re-evaluation of the marriage value concept and its tax implications - Journal 01 Apr 2014
Traps in valuations for tax purposes - Journal 01 Oct 2013
More by Wayne Lonergan
The Placer case (2018) from a valuation perspective - Journal 01 Jul 2019
Why the restoration method is flawed - Journal 01 Feb 2016
Tax and business valuations for SMEs workshop - Presentation 13 Aug 2015
Common errors in applying the market value concept - Journal 01 Jul 2015
The value of mining information and its tax implications - Journal 01 Aug 2013
Latest developments in valuation practice - Presentation 17 May 2012
Latest developments in valuation practices - Paper 17 May 2012
Identifying a rare species: Valuing a business - Paper 16 May 2008
Business valuations - Presentation 16 May 2008
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags