This presentation covers:
- the promoter penalty legislation in practice management context
- what is a 'reasonably arguable position'?
Source: Victoria
Published Date: 22 May 2007
This presentation covers:
More by Mark Poole
Distinguishing between capital and revenue expenditure - Presentation 17 May 2017
A question of attribution problems with the hedging election under TOFA - Journal 01 Apr 2012
Financial services: TOFA and consolidation - Paper 14 Oct 2010
Consolidation past, present and future financial services: TOFA and consolidation - Presentation 14 Oct 2010
TOFA - Much ado? - Presentation 07 Oct 2010
Tax in recessionary times - Paper 09 Oct 2009
Tax in recessionary times - Presentation 09 Oct 2009
TOFA and tax consolidation - Presentation 01 May 2009
When is a scheme benefit 'reasonably arguable' - Paper 22 May 2007
Individual Session
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags