This paper covers:
- The role that your evidence can play in a domestic court strategy relative to a MAP strategy in light of Glencore
- The impact of a multinational group's domestic dispute resolution strategy (i.e., to settle or to litigate) on potentially achieving a resolution via MAP/arbitration
- For both the multinational taxpayer and the ATO, the tension between preserving rights under domestic tax laws and achieving resolution via MAP / arbitration
- The impact of mandatory binding arbitration on the prospects of achieving resolution via MAP; and
- The OECD's desire to change the dialogue from dispute resolution' to dispute prevention' and what this might mean for multinational groups' dispute resolution strategies in the future.